INFORMATION NOTE-1: The role of universities is not only the production of technical and terminological knowledge, but also the perfection, universalization, and scientification of university-level education. Universities are the most fundamental of a nation's indispensable intellectual forces. Standardizing interfaculty education and adopting generalized pedagogical principles across all university cells can only be achieved by focusing on pedagogical approaches and strategies operationalized at the university level. One of the important ways to transfer and share scientific knowledge produced at universities with their interlocutors is to examine how these processes occur. Therefore, every study conducted to improve a country's higher education should be considered a significant intellectual contribution and value. In this context, the Higher Education Studies Application and Research Center (YUAM), established and operational within Istanbul Aydın University, is conducting a number of studies to improve and develop higher education in Türkiye.
INFORMATION NOTE 2: Today, the fundamental goal of higher education is to bridge the gap between theory and practice and to produce a body of theory informed by practice, thereby enriching vital, social, cultural, ethical, and aesthetic outcomes. In a globalizing world, the responsibilities of universities are also expanding. In this context, one of the fundamental goals of universities is to provide pedagogical training to both their instructors and students. The work carried out by members of the Higher Education Studies Application and Research Center (YUAM) at Istanbul Aydın University constitutes significant guiding research activities in shaping the future of higher education in Turkey and addressing deficiencies in various thematic areas.
INFORMATION NOTE 3: Academic inflation has reached serious levels today. While just a few decades ago, successful graduates of a good secondary school could open significant doors to career advancement and social status, now, opening these doors without a good doctoral degree is a pipe dream. The greatest challenge in responding to and controlling this intellectual inflation is deeply dependent on the quantity and quality of universities. A university generally serves three fundamental purposes: (i) the production of scientific knowledge, (ii) the planning and implementation of intra-university pedagogical activities related to the learning and teaching of scientific knowledge, and (iii) the creation and activation of various collaborative platforms for the development of society's understanding and culture of science. Looking to the future, the most formidable potential barriers to higher education are the second and third points mentioned above, which university structures have adopted as their primary functions. In other words, universities will have the opportunity to continue their existence in contexts where teaching is perfected and knowledge is socialized. Higher education institutions are, of course, places steeped in a scientific culture where scientific knowledge is distilled and crystallized. However, while scientists often succeed in performing science, they either never consider, or do not consider, the sharing of the knowledge they produce with others through appropriate teaching approaches and strategies valuable (scientific). This situation is known as the lost paradigm of higher education's pedagogy, which has existed and perhaps will always exist. YUAM offers various theories and models by investigating the pedagogy of higher education in a data-based manner. The research outputs produced in this context are listed below:
1. Radmard S., & Soysal Y., (2021). An examination of pre-service teachers' metaphorical imaginations regarding the concepts of "teacher candidate" and "teacher educator." Journal of Higher Education and Science, 11(2), xx-xx. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2021.xxx
2. Soysal, S., & Üstekidağ, S. (2021). An examination of pre-school education program outcomes according to the revised Bloom Taxonomy (1989-1994-2002-2006-2013). Paper presented at the 3rd INTERNATIONAL APRIL 23 SCIENTIFIC STUDIES CONGRESS.
3. Soysal, Y. & Soysal, S. (2021). Exploring Talk Moves of a Teacher Educator when Triggering, Developing, Elaborating, and Finalizing Classroom Discourses: A Vygotskian Perspective. Istanbul Aydın University Publications.
4. Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2020). Teachers' educators' questioning's influence on prospective teachers' cognitive productivity while discussing how to teach concepts. Istanbul: Istanbul Aydın University Publications.
5. Radmard, S. & Soysal, Y. (2019). Prospective teachers' metaphorical reasoning regarding the concepts of learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 11(2).
6. Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2019). Mapping out teacher educators' conceptions of teaching: Composing Phenomenographic argument. Higher Education and Science, (3), 502-518.
7. Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2019). Research into teacher educators' discursive moves: A Vygotskian perspective. Journal of Education, 200(1), 1-16.
8. Soysal, Y. (2019). A pedagogy-based discourse analysis on the principles of teaching in higher education: A Vygotskian perspective. Istanbul Aydın University Publications.
9. Soysal, Y., Radmard, S., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2018). An applied adaptation, validity, and reliability study of the pedagogical belief systems scale. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 626-642. 10. Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2018). An exploration of graduate learners' academic attributions: A case study from higher education context. Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 605-618.